JUST IN: Buhari Reappoints Abba Kyari, Boss Mustapha

President Muhammadu Buhari’s Chief of Staff, Abba Kyari on Tuesday told the Presidential Election Petitions Court, PEPC, that the Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in the last elections, Atiku Abubarkar, was not a Nigerian.

Kyari, who was the third witness in President Muhammad Buhari’s defence in court said that as at November, 25, 1946 when Atiku claimed that he was born in Jada, Adamawa State, Jada was part of Northern Cameroon, which was also referred to as French Cameroons.

Buhari opened his defence in the petition by Atiku Abubakar and his party, the PDP before the Presidential Election Petition Court on Tuesday.

At Tuesday’s proceedings, Buhari’s legal team led by Wole Olanipekun, SAN, tendered about 26 sets of documents and called three witnesses, including Kyari.

Others were the President’s mates at the Provincial Secondary School, Katsina, Katsina State, Maj.-Gen. Paul Tarfa (retd.) and Suleiman Maiadua (a retired civil servant), who said they graduated with Buhari in 1961.

The PDP and Atiku closed their case in the court on July 19 after calling 62 witnesses.

Among the documents tendered during Tuesday’s proceedings were copies of Buhari’s academic credentials, including a certified true copy, CTC, of the confidential result sheet of the University of Cambridge, West African School Certificate 1961 from Provincial Secondary School, Katsina.

Responding to questions on Atiku’s nationality, Kyari said by the French policy of assimilation, every child born in Jada, whose parents were from Jada, was automatically a Cameroon citizen before the 1961 plebiscite was conducted.

He said that before the plebiscite, Atiku’s parents also qualified to be Cameroonians.

Recall that the APC, in its reply to the petition by Atiku and the PDP, had claimed that the party had on candidate in the last presidential election, having fielded Atiku, a non-Nigerian by birth, and that the votes recorded by the party should be regarded as wasted votes.

The APC had argued that by Section 131(a) of the Constitution, a person must be a citizen of Nigeria by birth to be qualified to contest for President.

The party noted that Atiku was born on November 25, 1946 in Jada, now Adamawa State, then in Northern Cameroon (and French Administered Territory) “and is, therefore, a citizen of Cameroon.”

Led by Olanipekun, Kyari confirmed being the CoS to President Buhari and two documents earlier tendered by the lawyer.

He confirmed a letter written by General Alani Akinrinade, which the court had earlier admitted as Exhibit R5, in which he described Buhari as a distinguished international fellow.

The witness also identified the curriculum vitae, which the court had admitted as Exhibit 6.

Kyari adopted his written statement, which he urged the court to adopt as his evidence in the case.

Under cross-examination by counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Yunus Usman, SAN, Kyari confirmed that in the school certificate result tendered by the President and marked as Exhibit R19, Buhari has credit in five subjects, including English Language.


He said he has known Buhari for about 40 years and had been his CoS since August 27, 2015.

He told the court that Buhari communicates, officially in English language because English is the official language in Nigeria.

Usman asked Kyari to read a portion of a document, an exhibit before the court, where. Atiku congratulated Buhari for winning the APC presidential primary and expressed optimism that he (Buhari) would provide the country with quality leadership.

Under cross-examination by the lead petitioners’ lawyer, Livy Uzoukwu (SAN), Kyari confirmed that Atiku was vice president for eight years and he (Atiku) contested to be the presidential candidate of the APC in 2014.

The witness said although he is 67 years old, he did not personally know Atiku’s grandfather and father.

When shown Buhari’s Form CF001 (record of personal information, which a candidate submits to INEC before election), Kyari said the President’s certificates were not listed.

When shown Exhibit P1 (Buhari’s CV attached to Form CF001) by Uzoukwu and asked to confirm if Buhari’s certificate were listed, the witness said the document did not contain certificates, but the educational institutions attended by the President.

Kyari, who said he has never been in the military, confirmed that he stated in paragraph 7(6) of his deposition that Buhari has Diploma in Strategic Studies, but said the certificate was not included.

When asked by the petitioners’ lawyer if he has copies of the Buhari’s certificates with him in court, the witness said no.

Kyari said he is from Borno but not a Cameroonian.

Tarfa, who was the first witness, said he was the President’s mate in the Army and that they were enlisted on April 16, 1962.

He said they were enlisted after passing the examination and that they were taught in English.

Under cross-examination Tarfa said the main language of instruction in the Army is English language.

Tarfa identified some of those with whom they enlisted in the Army as Brigadier Ola Oni, Brigadier Duro Ajayi, Col. J. C. Ojukwu, the late Brigadier, Abdullahi Shelem and the late Maj. Shehu Yar’Adua.

When asked by Usman whether they were asked to hand over their certificates when they enlisted in the Army, the witless said nothing of such happened.

Usman: “You submitted all your school certificates to the Nigerian Army when you were enlisted?”

Witness: “There was nothing of such.”

Under cross-examination by Uzoukwu, Tarfa said as the Commmannder-in-Chief, Buhari has authority over all military formations.

Maiadua said he retired as a civil servant and has never been in the military. He said a former President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Umaru Abdulahi, was their mate in secondary school.

Maiadua identified Buhari and Abdulahi in a photograh taken by all his class mates at the Katsina Provincial College when they passed out in 1961. It was tendered before the court.

At the conclusion of Kyari’s testimony, the court adjourned the hearing till today, Wednesday, July 31 for the second respondent to continue his defence.


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here