Anambra South Senatorial poll: Court Orders INEC to Investigate Ubah, Returning Officer

A Federal High Court sitting in Awka, Anambra State has ordered that the Senator-elect for Anambra South, Ifeanyi Ubah, and the Returning Officer, Prof M.N. Umenweke, be investigated by the Independent National Electoral Commission over criminal allegations levelled against them.

The court gave the electoral body 14 days within which to conduct investigation into the matter for the purpose of prosecuting the respondents.

Ubah ran for the seat on the platform of the Young Progressives Party, YPP, and was declared winner of the February 23, national assembly election.

Justice I.B. Gafai made the order following an application for an order of mandamus brought by the senatorial candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Chris Uba.

The order read in part, “Upon the honourable court having delivered a considered judgement today, it hereby ordered as follows: the first respondent (INEC) shall, within 14 days from today, conduct or cause investigation into the criminal allegations of the applicant(Chris Uba).

READ ALSO: Herdsmen Kill Three, Injure One in Kogi Communities

“It shall prosecute, if the investigation result so warrants, the third respondent (Ifeanyi Uba) and any other person(s) implicated in its investigation.

“Where it considers it inexpedient to prosecute through its legal officers, it shall consider, at its liberty, the appointment of the applicant’s solicitors in this suit for the purpose of such prosecution.”

The PDP candidate had approached the court, asking for an order of mandamus compelling INEC to prosecute Ubah and others allegedly involved in the disorderly conduct which during the election at the Nnewi North Local Government Area that led to the announcement of the result of the inconclusive election held on the same day.

He also asked for “a further order of mandamus compelling the first respondent to prosecute the second defendant (Prof M.N. Umenweke) for announcing or publishing a false result to the effect that the third respondent had won the election held on the said February 23, 2019, even when they both knew that the said election was inconclusive and from which no genuine result had been generated.”