The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), said on Monday that he had no hand in the ongoing probe of the suspended acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu.
Malami, who was reacting to claims by one Victor Giwa that he (Malami) connived with one Donald Wokoma to witch-hunt him for refusing to testify against Magu before the Justice Salami-led panel described the allegation as ‘flimsy, fictitious, unfounded and a figment of the imagination of mischief makers.’
According to the minister, he was neither a member of the retired Justice Ayo Salami-led Presidential Panel probing Magu, nor was he responsible for the task of procuring witnesses for the panel.
Malami’s reaction was contained in a statement issued by his spokesperson, Dr. Umar Gwandu, on Monday.
It read further: “The Honourable Attorney-General never met Giwa and has never discussed any issue with the so-called Donald Wokoma nor did he ask anybody, personally or by proxy, to engage the so-called Victor to testify against Magu.
“He did not set up the investigation panel to probe Magu and is not saddled with any responsibility to procure witness(es) for the panel.
“The claim by Victor Giwa, Esq is therefore fictitious, unfounded and figment of imagination of mischief makers who want to create unnecessary attention and tarnish the good image of the Attorney-general of the Federation and Minister of Justice and labouring incessantly, these days, to falsely cast aspersion on the AGF’s hard earned reputation.
“The Honourable Attorney-General never met Giwa and has never discussed any issue with the so-called Donald Wokoma nor did he ask anybody, personally or by proxy, to engage the so-called Victor to testify against Magu.
READ ALSO: EFCC Probe: You Are on a Wild Goose Chase, Saraki Says
“He did not set up the investigation panel to probe Magu and is not saddled with any responsibility to procure witness(es) for the panel.”
He added that the Attorney-General was never a member of the panel, nor does not fall within the realm of the AGF’s authority to invite witness(es) for a presidential probe panel.
“The claim by Victor Giwa, Esq is therefore fictitious, unfounded and a figment of the imagination of mischief makers who want to court unnecessary attention and tarnish the good image of the Minister.
“They are laboring ceaselessly, these days, to falsely cast aspersions on the AGF’s hard-earned reputation.
“The Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation hereby calls on the so-called Victor Giwa to come and substantiate his allegations with details of the following:
“When did Victor Giwa meet the AGF on the issue? Where did he meet the AGF on the issue? How was the meeting? Was it by proxy? Or did the AGF send a representative?
“In what capacity was the representative, if any, sent? What were the terms of their engagement? What was the claimed `offer’? How was the so-called offer to testify against Magu made? Who were the witnesses?”
Recall that Giwa had in a statement on Sunday, alleged that it was Malami who instigated his arrest and that of one Fatima Hassan, after they refused to implicate Magu in evidence they gave before the Justice Salami-led panel last week.
