The peoples Democratic Party (PDP) caucus in the House of Representatives has sued the Minister of Information, Lai Mohammed, and the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) seeking the reversal of the controversial 6th Broadcasting Code.
The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, is also joined as co-defendant in the suit filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The Plaintiffs are; caucus leader, Kingsley Chinda, his Deputy, Chukwuma Onyema, Caucus Deputy Whip, Ajibola Muraina, Mark Gbillah, Tyough Robert, Bulus Solomon, Rimamnde Shawulu Kwewum, Yusuf Ayo Tajudeen and Onyeman Chukwuma.
The Plaintiffs in the suit filed on their behalf by Mr. Segun Fiki and Mr. Johnmary Chukwuasi Jideobi, want the court to determine, among others:
“Whether by the provisions of Section 36 (12) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), the Amended 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code enacted/issued by the 1st Defendant which created the purported offences of “hate speech” and “fake news” and correspondingly purported to have imposed penalties is not unconstitutional, null and void;
“whether or not, having regard to the extant provisions of Sections 6 and 23 of the National Broadcasting Commission Act Cap. N11 LFN 2004, the 1st Defendant has the statutory power to issue Broadcasting Code and whether the 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code purportedly issued is not a nullity and therefore void;
“Whether, having regard to the extant provisions of Sections 4 (1), (2), (3) & (4), 47 & 58(1) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and Order 14 of the Standing Rules of the House of Representatives (Procedure on Subsidiary Legislation), the 1st and 2nd Defendants have the power or vires to enact, issue and give effect to or enforce the Amended 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code without prior ratification by the House of Representatives of the National Assembly, and if not, whether the 1st Defendant’s enactment/issuance and application of the said Amended 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code is not an usurpation of the legislative powers expressly conferred on the legislature by the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).”
The PDP Reps prayed the court to declare the Amended 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code unconstitutional, null and void especially since the said offences and penalties set out in the code have not been defined and/or prescribed in any written law by the National Assembly of Nigeria?
They are also want the court to declare that the 2nd Defendant (NBC) is the sole authority statutorily empowered in Nigeria to enact and/or issue Broadcasting Codes throughout the Federation, to the exclusion of the 1st Defendant and that the 1st Defendant’s enactment of the 6th Amended Nigerian Broadcasting Code is ultra vires, unlawful, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.
Other prayers being sought by the defendants include; a declaration that having regard to the extant provisions of Sections 6 and 23 of the National Broadcasting Commission Act Cap. N11 LFN 2004, the 1st Defendant is bereft of any statutory power to issue Broadcasting Code and that the Amended 6th Nigerian Broadcasting Code purportedly issued by the 1st Defendant on or around the 13th August, 2020 is lacking in statutorily foundation and therefore void;
READ ALSO: Edo Election: IGP deploys DIG, AIG, eight CPs
An order nullifying, invalidating and quashing the 6th Amended Nigerian Broadcasting Code enacted/issued by the 1st Defendant on or around the 4th August 2020 in its entirety, same being arbitrary, unlawful, unconstitutional, null and void;
An order of the court restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants, whether by themselves or through their officers, agents, assigns, privies or servants howsoever described from further relying on, applying or enforcing or otherwise acting howsoever and in any manner on the said 6th Amended Nigerian Broadcasting Code enacted by the 1st Defendant on or around the 13th August 2020 and compel the third defendant (Attorney General) to enforce the judgment of this court in this suit forthwith and unconditionally and;
An order of the court perpetually restraining the 1st Defendant from further enacting, issuing or enforcing any National Broadcasting Code.
The suit has not been assigned to any court and no date has been fixed for hearing.
