The Next Edition
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Featured
  • Investigations
  • Foreign
  • Special Reports
  • Entertainment
  • Interviews
  • Advert Rate
No Result
View All Result
The Next Edition
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Featured
  • Investigations
  • Foreign
  • Special Reports
  • Entertainment
  • Interviews
  • Advert Rate
Home Top News

Imo: PDP Insists CJN, Six Others Should Recuse Themselves From Review Hearing

Next Edition by Next Edition
February 18, 2020
in Top News
Imo: PDP Insists CJN, Six Others Should Recuse Themselves From Review Hearing

Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad

0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

The leadership of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has asked the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad to recuse himself from the hearing of the review application on the Imo State governorship election petition.

The party has also, made a similar demand on the six other justices of the Supreme Court that presided and delivered the January 14 judgment on the 2019 Imo State governorship election petition.

You might also like

NAFDAC Warns On Recalled U.S. Supplements

US Cuts Nigerians’ Visa Validity To Three Months

3 Children Killed As Train Crashes Into School Van

The other six justices are Justice Nwah Sylvester Ngwuta, Justice Olukayode Ariwola, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Justice Amina Adamu Augie, and Justice Uwani Musa Abba Aji.

The apex court will on Tuesday hear the application for review of its judgement that sacked Emeka Ihedioha of the PDP as Imo State governor and installed Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in his place.

The PDP, in a letter to the CJN, dated February 14, 2020 and signed by the Chairman, Prince Uche Secondus and National Secretary, Senator Ibrahim Tsauri, said their request was based on grounds of likelihood of bias and the need to ensure fair hearing.

The party emphasised that it had become very imperative that the CJN and the other justices that served on that panel be replaced to ensure that fairness and justice is not only done, but also seen to have been done.

The letter said in part, “As a follow up to our earlier call on all members of the panel to recuse themselves, we have now sought to formalise that request or demand.

“We hereby request that the seven persons that heard the case earlier recuse themselves from participating in the consideration of this new application.

“We are not unmindful of the fact that a litigant cannot dictate to the court the panel that should hear its case. However, due to the extraordinary circumstances and the nature of this case, we think that our request is a fair one that meets the justice of the case.

“Consequently, we feel it as our patriotic duty to hereby humbly request that your Lordship constitute a different panel of this great court (other than the one that delivered the judgement) for the purpose of hearing this application.

“Your Lordship would recall that a panel of Hon. Justices of the Supreme Court presided by your good self on Tuesday the 14th day of January 2020, delivered judgement on the above appeal.

“Your Lordship may further recall that on February 5th, 2020 the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) filed an application praying that the judgement of 14th January 2020 be set aside on grounds of nullity of the judgment, among other grounds.

“The judgement sought to be set aside has generated so much misgiving not only among lawyers but in the general polity as a whole because of the uncertainty it has introduced into our electoral jurisprudence, its potential for crisis in our democracy, the irreconcilability of the calculations contained therein and their resultant effect.

“At the heat of the moment, the Party addressed a Press Conference and expressed its displeasure and disagreement with the judgement, and called on the Justices that heard the case to recuse themselves during any possible future review of the case that may come before the Court, the Party even went further to ask the President of the Court to even resign.

READ ALSO: Imo: Supreme Court Lacks Powers To Hear Ihedioha’s Review Application — Uzodinma

“As a follow up to our earlier call on all members of the Panel to recuse themselves, we have now sought to formalise that request or demand. We hereby request that the 7 persons that heard the case earlier recuse themselves from participating in the consideration of this new application.

“My Lord, our request is founded on Section 36(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which guarantees fair hearing to every citizen or entity in the determination of his rights or obligations.

“Furthermore, the time honoured and tested principles of natural justice, particularly that no man shall be a judge in his own cause is particularly relevant to this solemn request.

“Allegation of bias or likelihood of bias goes to the root of fair hearing. Denial of right to fair hearing is a logical consequence of bias in any proceeding before a Court or a tribunal.

“The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as Amended (Constitution) guarantees the right of an individual to fair hearing. An individual’s right to fair hearing includes the right to have his/her rights and obligations determined by an independent and impartial tribunal.

“The above is clearly enshrined in Section 36 (1) of the Constitution, which provides as follows: ‘In the determination of his civil rights and obligations, including any question or determination by or against any government or authority, a person shall be entitled to a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court or other tribunal established by law and constituted in such manner as to secure its independence and impartiality’

“The right to an independent and impartial tribunal is a major factor in determining if fair hearing has been observed by a Court.

“The relevant question on the issue of bias is what an ordinary man on the street would think about the fairness of the proceedings conducted by judges accused of likelihood of bias.

“We may even be wrong on the allegations made against the learned justices of the Supreme Court that sat on the case in question. We may have been bitter about the clearly observed inadequacies in that judgment, but this is now beside the point.

“The relevant question is: can any reasonable person who heard the Press Conference and several protests by the Party, PDP, the Civil Society Organisations and Nigerians generally, all over the country, including foreign embassies, the involvement of even the international community, feel that the same panel that has been the subject of these allegations, rightly or wrongly by the Party, can sit and deliver impartial justice on the same case on review? We think not,” the party contended.

Tags: Civil Society OrganisationsEmeka Ihedioha of the PDPfeaturedHon. Justices of the Supreme CourtHope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress (APC)ImoImo State GovernorJustice Amina Adamu AugieJustice Kudirat Kekere-EkunJustice Nwah Sylvester NgwutaJustice Olukayode AriwolaJustice Uwani Musa Abba AjiPDP Insists CJNReview HearingSix Others Should Recuse Themselves
Next Edition

Next Edition

Recommended For You

NAFDAC Warns On Recalled U.S. Supplements

NAFDAC Warns On Recalled U.S. Supplements

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has alerted Nigerians about the recall of certain multivitamins and iron supplements in the U.S. NAFDAC, via...

US Visa Applicants to Submit Social Media Handles, Email Addresses

US Cuts Nigerians’ Visa Validity To Three Months

  The United States Department of State has announced an update to its non-immigrant visa policy for Nigerian citizens. According to a press release issued by the US...

Many Trapped As Train Derails In Lagos next edition.

3 Children Killed As Train Crashes Into School Van

    About three children were killed and six others injured after a passenger train hit a school van attempting to cross a manned level crossing in the...

JAMB Eases Restrictions On Services To Aid pre-2020 Candidates

JAMB Releases Mop-up Exam Results

The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has released the results of its mop-up Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) held on Saturday, June 28. In a statement yesterday...

Next Post
I Am Not Happy With What’s Happening In The North – Sanusi

I Am Not Happy With What’s Happening In The North – Sanusi




Related News

Nigeria vs Algeria: Lawan Expresses Confidence in Eagles, Departs for Egypt

Senate President Condemns Attack On Ekweremadu

FG launches Clothing, Accessories Factory

FG launches Clothing, Accessories Factory

Foreign Titbits: Puerto Rico increases Hurricane Maria death toll to 2,975

Foreign Titbits: Puerto Rico increases Hurricane Maria death toll to 2,975




The Next Edition

Office Address

3B, Agboola Aina street, Off Toyin Street,
Ikeja, Lagos.

Quick Contact Details

Phone:
08033018430
Whatsapp:
08051679910

Email:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Categories

  • Aviation
  • Beauty
  • Breaking News
  • Business
  • Columnists
  • Editorial
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Featured
  • Football
  • Foreign
  • Headline News
  • Home & Garden
  • Interviews
  • Investigations
  • North Central
  • North East
  • North West
  • Opinion
  • Parenting
  • Politics
  • Relationships
  • South East
  • South West
  • South-South
  • Special Reports
  • Sports
  • Top News
  • Vox Pops

© Next Edition Business Development Limited

  • About Us
  • Advert Rate
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Featured
  • Investigations
  • Foreign
  • Special Reports
  • Entertainment
  • Interviews
  • Advert Rate

© Next Edition Business Development Limited